Why cash management is a problem. Why direct indexing makes it worse. And how automation can solve the problem.
Tax management is a sexy problem (OK. That’s not a sentence I ever expected to write). What I mean by this is that everyone understands that tax-managing a portfolio is complicated, so automating it is kind of impressive. In contrast, automating the investment and withdrawal of cash seems dull. But if you look at the day-to-day lives of wealth managers, it turns out they spend a lot of time managing cash, which is a waste – wealth managers have a lot better things to do with their time. Cash management automation may be dull, but it’s important.
What’s so hard about cash management? Here is a partial list of things a wealth advisor has to worry about:
If you have separately management accounts (SMAs) in sleeves (subaccounts), there are a couple more things to worry about:
None of these tasks are all that hard taken individually. But taken as a whole, summed across your entire book, it becomes a time sink.
The good news is that every element we’ve listed can either be eliminated or automated. In particular, automated rebalancing systems will, yes, automatically:
As for SMAs, the best way to avoid the problems they create is to simply not use sleeves (see our Q&A on The Case Against Sleeves). Instead, manage portfolios holistically (what we call “post sleeves”).
As we said at the beginning, none of this sounds all that exciting. And (sadly) your clients are unlikely to know or appreciate that you do all this, but this is all the more reason to not spend your time doing it. That’s what automation is for.